Is anyone tired of the constant stream of VELO3 “We’re All Prompts” garbage videos?

The Misunderstanding of Prompts in Popular Media

In recent months, a wave of Veo3 videos has flooded our feeds, promoting a rather perplexing idea: “we’re all prompts.” While the intention may be to provoke thought and discussion, many viewers, myself included, find these videos lacking in substance and clarity.

The primary issue lies in a fundamental misunderstanding of what a prompt truly represents. Narrators often reference the “prompt theory” as if it encapsulates a complex philosophical or technological standpoint, but that misses the mark entirely. At its core, a prompt serves as an input, guiding a system’s output rather than being an output itself.

The creators of these videos appear to overlook this crucial distinction. Instead of fostering an informed dialogue, they tend to perpetuate confusion around a concept that is quite simple when understood correctly.

As consumers of content, it’s important to sift through what is presented to us critically. While catchy phrases are designed to grab attention, let’s strive for clarity and comprehension in discussions about prompts and their implications. It’s vital that we engage with such topics on a deeper level, promoting understanding rather than broadcasting oversimplified ideas.

If you share my sentiment about the quality of these videos, we’d love to hear your thoughts. How can we elevate the conversation about prompts in a more meaningful way?