Version 417: How Do We Brainstorm and Strategize Now That GPT’s Neural Network is Severely Impaired?

Title: Reassessing AI Tools for Creative Planning: A Shift from GPT-4o

In the realm of digital creativity and planning, AI has been a pivotal resource, offering insights and support for brainstorming sessions and document preparations. However, recent experiences have led to a reassessment of how we utilize these tools, particularly focusing on the evolving capabilities of GPT-4o.

While GPT-4o was previously a reliable companion for generating ideas and refining business documents, its recent performance has raised some eyebrows. Here are some of the notable changes I’ve encountered:

1. Content Quality: The quality of the output has diminished, with the tool frequently resorting to fabricating information or only partially addressing the queries posed.

2. Feedback Mechanism: On several occasions, I found myself pointing out inaccuracies, only to receive a somewhat sheepish acknowledgment—“you’re right!”—from the AI.

3. Repeated Errors: Despite the acknowledgments, the same mistakes tend to recur, leading to continued frustration.

4. Indirect Guidance: Rather than providing direct, actionable advice, it often nudges users towards utilizing alternative resources, implying that the onus of problem-solving lies elsewhere.

Despite these challenges, GPT-4o has historically been a valuable asset in the ideation phase—helping to streamline thoughts and articulate concepts more concisely in business communications. The ability to evolve ideas has been essential in creating impactful documents.

As we navigate these shifts in AI technology, it’s crucial to stay adaptive and consider how we can leverage other tools or strategies to achieve our creative and professional objectives. The journey may be bumpy, but it’s part of the ever-evolving landscape of digital innovation.