Evaluating the Trustworthiness of Gemini 2.5 Pro’s Audio Analysis

As someone navigating the complex world of music with auditory sensitivities, I recently began using Gemini 2.5 Pro to help identify certain sounds that I find uncomfortable, particularly related to crowd noise. For nearly a decade, enjoying music has been a challenge for me, largely due to severe sensitivities. In the past, I often relied on friends or family to screen songs before I felt comfortable giving them a listen. However, thanks to Gemini 2.5 Pro, I’m hopeful that I can regain some of that lost joy.

I’ve tested the application with three songs from Weezer, and the results have been promising. Out of the three tracks, I was warned about one being potentially triggering, while the other two were flagged as safe. Yet, I find myself grappling with some doubt: can I trust Gemini’s analysis? What if it misidentified elements in the songs, leading to unnecessary anxiety? When I first delved into using the app, most of my research revolved around reviews and articles rather than firsthand experiences with the audio analysis itself.

The turning point came when I provided Gemini with YouTube links for the songs. It indicated that it had performed an audio analysis, but I am left wondering about the reliability of its results. How accurate can those assessments actually be? Is Gemini 2.5 Pro prone to yielding false negatives, or can it genuinely deliver on its promises?

As I consider incorporating this tool into my music-listening habits, I’m eager to gather insights from fellow users. If you’ve had experience with Gemini 2.5 Pro or similar audio-analysis software, I’d love to hear your thoughts on its accuracy and trustworthiness. Your insights could make a significant difference for those of us trying to enjoy music without triggering our sensitivities.