GPT-5 advanced voice mode is lazy, dumb, completely useless, and above all, extremely frustrating.

Exploring the Shortcomings of GPT-5’s Advanced Voice Mode: An Honest Review

In recent times, AI-powered voice assistants have promised to revolutionize our daily interactions with technology, offering hands-free, conversational experiences that can help with everything from information retrieval to task management. GPT-5’s advanced voice mode was heralded as a significant step forward in this realm. However, many users, including myself, have encountered substantial challenges that hinder its practical usability.

Despite its promising concept—such as engaging in conversations during commutes or preparing for meetings—the current implementation falls short of expectations. The responses generated are often superficial, lacking depth and nuance. Instead of providing insightful, tailored answers, the assistant tends to deliver vague generalities or, worse, inaccurate information. These issues are compounded by logical inconsistencies and contradictions within its replies.

Even when explicit and detailed instructions are provided, the system frequently responds with what can be described as a lack of effort or engagement, which significantly diminishes its usefulness. This persistent pattern of underperformance has been increasingly frustrating, leading some users to question the value of subscribing to this service.

Ultimately, while the idea behind GPT-5’s advanced voice mode is compelling, its current execution leaves much to be desired. For those considering investment in this technology, it is worth weighing the limitations observed so far. Have others experienced similar frustrations? How does this impact your perception of AI voice assistants’ future potential? Sharing insights can help better understand whether these issues are temporary glitches or indicative of broader systemic challenges.