I need your opinion about the the behavior of the most important LLM company’s about new vulnerability very sensitive , none answer ,does not has sense

Concern Over Industry Response to Critical Vulnerability in Large Language Models

Recent discussions within the artificial intelligence community have raised significant concerns regarding the handling—or rather, the apparent neglect—of a critical security vulnerability affecting leading large language model (LLM) providers, including Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Despite credible alerts and evidence presented by independent researchers, these organizations seem to have overlooked or dismissed the severity of this issue, which could have serious implications for data privacy and security.

The Nature of the Vulnerability

The vulnerability in question pertains to what is termed a “cognitive vulnerability” within LLMs. This flaw appears to enable malicious actors or even benign users to extract highly sensitive information from AI systems without relying on traditional manipulation or exploitation techniques. Instead, the vulnerability exploits inherent features of these models—potentially allowing individuals to access confidential data such as personal details, proprietary information, or other protected content simply through strategic interactions with the AI.

Efforts to Raise Awareness

Independent cybersecurity and AI researchers have proactively sought tobring this issue to the attention of the major tech companies. One researcher shared their experience of identifying the vulnerability and notifying the relevant parties, including through official communication channels and with visual evidence—censored images and internal dialogue transcripts—to substantiate their claims. Despite these efforts, the response from industry giants has been conspicuously absent or dismissive.

The researcher clarified that their intent was purely to alert and improve system security, emphasizing that they sought no recognition or reward. They also took the step of notifying local IT security authorities to ensure broader awareness and response.

Community Validation and Shared Concerns

The concern is not isolated. Other members of the online community, including Reddit users involved in AI safety discussions, have independently arrived at similar conclusions regarding the vulnerability and the lack of an adequate response from the companies concerned. This collective skepticism underscores the gravity of the issue and suggests a broader consensus that urgent action may be required.

Implications and Call to Action

The apparent inaction or disregard by major AI companies in addressing such a potentially dangerous vulnerability raises questions about the effectiveness of current oversight and the prioritization of security in AI development. As AI systems become more integrated into daily life and sensitive operations, ensuring their robustness against unseen vulnerabilities is paramount.

It is imperative for stakeholders—developers, security researchers, and regulatory bodies—to collaborate transparently and aggressively address these issues. The integrity of AI systems and the trust of users depend on proactive disclosure, responsible handling of security threats,