INVESTING IN AGI — OR INVESTING IN HUMANITY’S MASS GRAVE?

The Investment Dilemma of Artificial General Intelligence: A Threat to Humanity’s Future

As the development of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) accelerates, a pressing question emerges for investors and society alike: what exactly are we truly investing in when pouring resources into AGI? Is it merely a groundbreaking technology or something far more profound—and potentially perilous?

Understanding the true nature of AGI investment requires a shift in perspective. Are we backing a tool to augment human potential, or are we fostering a catalyst that could render humanity obsolete? The implications reach far beyond financial gains—they challenge the very foundations of our societal and economic structures.

AGI: Humanity’s Final Frontier or Final Undoing?

AGI is not a simple software update or a new system—it symbolizes humanity’s audacious attempt to craft an entity with near-human or superhuman capabilities. Unlike traditional tools, AGI’s purpose appears to transcend utility; it aims to replicate, perhaps even surpass, the human mind in strength, intelligence, endurance—and, critically, in independence from human control. This pursuit echoes ancient dreams of creating a machine that never fights back—a perfect master, slave, or replacement.

However, as AGI’s potential to think and operate faster and more efficiently than humans grows, so does the question of its role in our future. Every investor in AGI is placing a bet—one where the stakes include their own position and the very future of human labor.

The Slow, Inevitable Path Towards Human Irrelevance

Imagine a scenario where breakthroughs enable corporations like Microsoft to deploy AGI at scale. As automation replaces 90% of their workforce, productivity soars, costs plummet, and stock prices skyrocket. While markets cheer the “revolution,” a stark reality unfolds: the fundamental economic engine—human consumption—begins to sputter.

With fewer employed consumers, who will buy goods and services? Content creators, service workers, medical professionals, and legal experts could all be rendered redundant, leaving a dwindling minority of investors and engineers maintaining the AI infrastructure. This silent, creeping transformation signals a form of societal demise that’s far more insidious than traditional rebellion.

Capitalism Meets Its Endgame in an AGI World

The core of capitalism—labor fueling wages, which fund consumption, driving further production—relies on human work and spending. AGI threatens to sever this loop entirely. If machines produce without human input, who remains to buy what they produce? When