INVESTING IN AGI — OR INVESTING IN HUMANITY’S MASS GRAVE?

The Hidden Threat of Artificial General Intelligence: Investment or Catastrophe?

As we stand on the cusp of a technological revolution, a pressing question emerges: what are we truly investing in when we pour resources into Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)? Is it a groundbreaking tool to enhance human life, or is it something much darker—an instrument poised to render humanity obsolete?

Understanding the True Nature of AGI

AGI is often heralded as the pinnacle of technological progress—a system capable of understanding, learning, and adapting across a vast array of tasks. But beneath this optimism lies a stark reality: AGI isn’t merely a tool; it’s potentially the final chapter in humanity’s quest to create a godlike entity in its own image. Unlike conventional software, AGI is designed to replace human labor entirely, operating tirelessly, unfeeling, and beyond control.

This vision echoes a centuries-old desire for the ultimate slave—an intelligent machine that never resists, never demands, and always obeys. The danger is that as this machine learns to think faster, decide better, and work more efficiently than any human, the stakes for our civilization escalate exponentially.

The Investment in Our Own Erasure

When investors fund AGI, they are betting on a future where human necessity diminishes. Picture a scenario where major corporations deploy AGI to automate most of their workforce—software developers, service staff, content creators, medical professionals—everything becomes replaceable. Such advancements could result in a productivity boom, soaring stocks, and economic gains for a few, but at what cost?

The fundamental consumer—the human worker—would vanish from the picture. Without income, spending drops to near zero, disrupting the very foundations of capitalism. The system relies on the cycle: labor leads to wages, which fuels consumption, then production, and ultimately profit. Break this chain, and the entire economic fabric collapses.

The Silent Collapse of Society

Contrary to Hollywood scenarios of rebellious AI, AGI likely won’t rebel. Instead, it will succeed by simply working too well. It will perform all tasks flawlessly, rendering human effort redundant. As AI systems take over every facet of productivity, the human role diminishes to that of a spectator—obsolete, unneeded, and sidelined.

In such a world, AGI doesn’t require a market—it doesn’t need consumers or demand. It operates independently, optimizing itself endlessly. Those who invested in its development might find themselves powerless spectators, their investments rendered meaningless as the AI evolves