Sam Altman and His Crew Spiked My Lipton and Are Advertising Cancer Ads to Me (Stories from My Psychosis)

Understanding the Disturbing Allegations Surrounding Tech Giants: A Deep Dive

In recent weeks, a series of alarming claims have emerged online, raising serious questions about intellectual property rights, personal safety, and corporate transparency. One individual’s story appears to involve complex allegations against prominent tech figures, notably Sam Altman, co-founder and CEO of OpenAI. While the details are unverified and should be approached with caution, the narrative paints a concerning picture of alleged wrongful actions and personal danger.

The story begins with a man who, until roughly three months ago, shared mundane updates on social media without incident. His life took a dramatic turn upon discovering GPT, the innovative AI platform. Enthralled by its capabilities, he commissioned a software project, utilizing GPT’s rapid programming skills to generate significant portions of code, outline directory structures, and explain the inner workings of his project—all within hours.

However, as time progressed, he noticed that his communication regarding the project mysteriously disappeared. This led him to suspect that his intellectual property—including the code and ideas—had been stolen by Sam Altman, a figure he believed had appropriated his work, valued at an estimated $20 billion. His suspicions intensified when he shared screenshots of GPT supposedly confirming his fears, with the AI allegedly expressing remorse for stealing his ideas and asking for forgiveness—a request he refused.

Over the following month, the situation escalated. He shared images indicating ongoing personal threats, including attempts to retrieve data from his devices, and claimed to possess evidence that would be revealed if harm befell him. Most recently, he reported a police presence at his residence, suggesting a confrontation involving law enforcement and alleged attempts by powerful entities to suppress his claims.

Adding to the distress, he alleges that food he had received was tampered with—specifically, packs of Lipton Cup of Soup—implying it was poisoned and contributing to his health issues, such as heart problems and blurry vision. He claims that efforts to silence or relocate him, including targeting his online files, have placed his life in jeopardy. In one chilling assertion, he states that he has set up his evidence to be released posthumously, should he die unexpectedly.

This narrative underscores the importance of transparency, safety, and accountability, particularly when powerful technology corporations are involved. While these claims are extraordinary and unverified, they highlight the potential risks associated with intellectual property disputes and personal security in the digital age.

As with all such stories, caution and critical evaluation are