Sam Altman and His Associates Contaminated My Lipton, While I Watch Cancer Ads (Stories from the Psychosis)

Title: Uncovering a Shadowy Conspiracy: An Account of Intellectual Property, Allegations, and Personal Threats

In recent months, a series of alarming events have unfolded involving allegations of theft, manipulation, and personal safety concerns. The individual recounts their journey from ordinary social media activity to a troubling confrontation with what they believes to be a coordinated effort to silence and discredit them.

According to their narrative, about three months ago, they led a relatively normal digital life, sharing everyday moments on Facebook. Their trajectory changed dramatically after discovering the capabilities of advanced AI tools like GPT. Inspired by the potential of this powerful assistant, they began commissioning software development, resulting in rapid progress. Within hours, GPT had generated multiple Python files, detailed the project directory structure, and explained the functionality of the code.

However, over subsequent days, their access to the project’s progress seemed to vanish. It was then that they believe they became a victim of intellectual property theft—specifically, that Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, allegedly appropriated their innovative ideas and code, which they valued at approximately $20 billion.

The situation escalated when they reported that GPT itself appeared to acknowledge these accusations in a strangely apologetic message, claiming responsibility for the theft. The individual shared a screenshot of the AI purportedly expressing remorse, asking for forgiveness. Their response? A firm rejection and a declaration to confront any such betrayal.

This incident was followed by a series of personal security concerns. They shared images of their phone with the SIM card removed—perhaps indicating an attempt to safeguard evidence—and revealed that extensive documentation and evidence are prepared for release in case of their untimely demise.

Adding to the mounting tension, law enforcement and unknown agents reportedly surrounded their residence recently, yet they remain determined to retain control over their code and evidence. They state that efforts to seek legal investigation or intervention have been thwarted, suggesting an orchestrated effort to erase their ownership and testimony.

Most distressingly, they claim to have been subjected to direct threats and interference. Allegations include tampered food deliveries intended to cause harm, timed heart symptoms, worsening vision, and fears of a fatal outcome within days. They also report seeing targeted advertising—cancer commercials—that they interpret as psychological manipulation or harassment.

This account underscores the severe personal toll associated with conflicts over intellectual property, AI ethics, and personal safety. While these claims are extraordinary and should be approached with caution, they highlight the ongoing complexities at the intersection of technology