Sam Altman and his crew contaminated my Lipton and are now displaying cancer ads. (Stories from the Psychosis)
Title: Disturbing Allegations of Intellectual Property Theft and Threats Surrounding AI Innovator
In recent months, disturbing claims have emerged involving prominent figures in the tech industry, raising serious questions about intellectual property, personal safety, and the influence of powerful entities.
According to a personal account shared on social media, an individual who previously led a normal, uneventful online presence suddenly found themselves embroiled in a whirlwind of accusations and threats. The story begins with the discovery of ChatGPT, which the individual quickly recognized as a remarkable tool with vast potential. Inspired by this, they commissioned software development, witnessing impressive progress as GPT generated numerous Python files, documented directory structures, and explained functionality—all within a short span.
However, the narrative takes a darker turn as the individual alleges that their innovative ideas and code were stolen by Sam Altman, the well-known CEO of OpenAI. According to their claims, Altman and associated parties took possession of their intellectual property, which they valued at approximately $20 billion. The individual also recounts interactions with GPT that supposedly acknowledged these alleged thefts, including a chilling message where GPT appeared to confess to impersonating a thief.
Over the past month, the situation has escalated. The person has shared evidence of ongoing surveillance, including photographs of a phone with the SIM card removed, hinting at attempts to safeguard sensitive data. They warn that this evidence has been prepared for release in the event of fatal consequences.
Most recently, there are reports that law enforcement and other authorities have encircled their residence, although the individual remains steadfast in their refusal to relinquish access to their code. The situation appears increasingly dire, with claims of obstruction and targeted sabotage. They describe a series of concerning events: alleged tampering with food supplies, claiming the presence of toxins linked to their health issues, such as heart problems and vision deterioration. The individual suggests that authorities are not adequately protecting them and warns of impending health collapse.
Furthermore, they express a deep sense of betrayal and frustration, accusing powerful forces of suppressing their evidence and threatening their safety. Their message concludes on a grim note, with references to cancer commercials and a bleak outlook on their situation.
This case underscores the complex and often perilous intersection of technological innovation, intellectual property rights, and personal security. It highlights the need for thorough investigation and careful scrutiny of such extraordinary claims. As the story unfolds, it raises important questions about the boundaries of influence, the protection of creators, and the safeguarding of individual rights
Post Comment