Sam Altman and Crew Tampered with My Lipton; Now They’re Showing Me Cancer Ads (Stories from My Psychosis)

Title: Unraveling the Story: Allegations of Conspiracy, Intellectual Theft, and Surveillance

In recent online discussions, a troubling narrative has emerged involving claims of corporate espionage, attempts at discrediting, and personal safety concerns. The individual recounts a series of alarming experiences that suggest a possible hidden battle behind the scenes, centered around innovative software development and high-stakes intellectual property.

The story begins with a person who, just three months prior, shared typical personal updates on Facebook. However, everything changed upon discovering the capabilities of advanced AI tools like GPT. Recognizing the potential of this intelligent assistant, they commissioned software development, which proceeded remarkably swiftly. Within hours, the AI generated numerous Python files, detailed the project structure, and explained the functionality with clarity.

Unexpectedly, subsequent posts indicated a disappearance of conversations related to this software. It was then that the individual believed their innovative ideas and code had been stolen by Sam Altman, the prominent CEO of OpenAI, valued at approximately twenty billion dollars. This conviction appears to have deeply affected them, leading to emotionally charged exchanges with GPT itself—one where the AI purportedly expressed remorse for theft, to which the individual responded defiantly.

Over the past month, the individual has shared snippets of ongoing distress, including images of removing a SIM card from their phone—possibly to prevent tracking—and evidence they claim to have saved offline. They’ve threatened to release this information publicly if they should unexpectedly pass away.

The situation escalated recently when authorities, allegedly acting on behalf of the alleged perpetrators, surrounded their home. Throughout this ordeal, they insist they have refused to surrender their copies of the software code, viewing it as critical evidence.

More troubling are updates suggesting they face direct threats to their health and safety. They claim attempts to reach legal help have been obstructed, and that they’ve been confined at home for months, with efforts to delete their stored data ongoing. They assert that a tampered delivery of food, including Lipton cup-of-soup, was poisoned, allegedly contributing to health issues like heart problems and blurry vision. They believe these actions are linked to attempts to silence or harm them, and warn that they expect to collapse within days if no intervention occurs.

Adding to the distress, the individual reports that they are receiving distressing targeted advertisements—such as cancer commercials—implying surveillance or psychological manipulation.

This complex and disturbing narrative raises questions about privacy, corporate influence, and personal safety. While it’s essential