If AI will replace jobs, aren’t ,the so called corporate“bullshit jobs” supposed to disappear first?

Will AI Eliminate ‘Bullshit Jobs’ Before Traditional Roles? A Closer Look

As Artificial Intelligence continues to advance, a compelling question arises: if AI is poised to replace a significant portion of the workforce, why do certain types of roles—particularly what some refer to as “corporate ‘bullshit jobs’”—seem to persist? Specifically, roles centered around administrative tasks, such as project management, consulting, and other corporate functions, often involve extensive meetings, presentations, and email correspondence. If these activities are deemed unnecessary or superficial, why haven’t they been automated or diminished more rapidly?

Many experts suggest that these so-called “bullshit jobs” serve functions beyond immediate productivity—they sustain organizational structures, facilitate communication, or fulfill social and psychological needs within companies. They are often embedded deep within corporate hierarchies, making their disappearance more complex than simply automating a task.

Moreover, a curious trend emerges when considering the educational backgrounds of individuals in different roles. Why do degrees in the humanities, languages, design, or computer science face greater uncertainty in an AI-driven landscape—given their creative and technical nature—compared to degrees in economics, finance, or administrative fields? One perspective is that roles related to financial analysis, economic planning, or bureaucratic administration tend to be more structured and systematized, making them seemingly more susceptible to automation and AI integration.

However, roles perceived as less essential to core productivity may actually be more vulnerable in the long term, especially if organizations recognize that streamlining communication, reducing unnecessary meetings, and automating routine tasks can lead to greater efficiency. Conversely, jobs rooted in creativity, critical thinking, and nuanced human interaction could prove more resilient, at least for now.

In conclusion, the ongoing evolution of AI raises important questions about the future of work and the nature of employment across industries. While some roles may gradually fade away, others rooted in social, creative, or complex decision-making may persist, reshaping the landscape of employment in profound ways. Understanding these dynamics is crucial as we navigate the changing world of work in the age of Artificial Intelligence.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *