Will AI Make Certain Jobs Obsolete First? Rethinking the Future of Work
As Artificial Intelligence continues to advance rapidly, many are pondering its implications for the job market. A common question arises: if AI is poised to replace many roles, should we expect certain types of jobs—often labeled as “corporate or administrative”—to disappear first?
Specifically, roles like project managers, consultants, or administrative assistants are frequently criticized as being built around tasks such as creating PowerPoint presentations, managing emails, or attending endless meetings. These tasks are often considered non-essential or “bullshit jobs” in the modern workspace. Naturally, one might assume that positions heavily centered on such activities would be the first to go once automation becomes widespread.
But if that’s the case, why haven’t these roles already seen significant declines? Why do we often see ongoing demand for administrative positions while roles within factories or housekeeping seem relatively more stable?
Another layer to this conversation is the disparity in job vulnerability across educational backgrounds. Why do degrees in fields like the humanities, languages, arts, or computer science seem to be at greater risk compared to degrees in economics, finance, or administrative disciplines?
The evolution of AI prompts us to reconsider traditional assumptions about job security and relevance. Certain creative or analytical roles, typically associated with more formal degrees, may be more susceptible to automation than roles rooted in practical, operational, or interpersonal skills.
The future of work is complex, and as we navigate these changes, it’s crucial to understand which jobs might evolve, which may become obsolete, and how education and skills training can adapt to these shifts. Staying informed and adaptable will be key in the rapidly changing landscape of employment.
Leave a Reply