Will AI Eliminating Jobs Lead to the Disappearance of “Bullshit Jobs” in Corporations First?

Will AI Eliminate ‘Bullsh*t Jobs’ Before Traditional Roles? Exploring the Future of Employment

In recent discussions about artificial intelligence and automation transforming the workforce, a compelling question has emerged: if AI is set to replace many jobs, shouldn’t the so-called “bullsh*t jobs” within corporate environments be the first to go?

Many consider roles like project managers, consultants, and certain administrative positions to fall into this category—primarily involving tasks such as creating PowerPoint presentations, responding to endless emails, and attending unnecessary meetings. If these activities are viewed as non-essential or even frivolous, it stands to reason they might be among the first to vanish as AI advances.

However, this raises an intriguing paradox. Why do we often see those involved in these roles potentially at greater risk of displacement before more tangible jobs like housekeepers or factory workers? Are these roles more vulnerable to automation, or is there another factor at play?

Furthermore, there appears to be a disparity in how different academic disciplines are affected by technological shifts. Degrees in the humanities, languages, design, or computer science seem to face higher risks compared to fields such as economics, finance, or bureaucratic administration. What underlying reasons contribute to this uneven landscape? Is it a matter of the nature of the work, the skills required, or societal valuation?

As we navigate an era of rapid technological change, understanding which jobs are most susceptible to automation—and why—becomes essential. The conversation around AI’s impact on employment isn’t just about technology; it’s about the evolving nature of work itself, and which roles will adapt or fade away in the coming years.