Will AI Replacement Lead to the Disappearance of “Corporate Bullshit Jobs”?

Will AI Replace Certain Jobs First? Exploring the Future of “Bullshit Jobs” and Educational Risks

As artificial intelligence continues to develop at a rapid pace, a compelling question arises: which jobs are most vulnerable to automation and AI-powered disruption? There is a common narrative suggesting that AI will replace many roles that are considered less valuable or inherently redundant—often referred to as “bullshit jobs.” But if this is the case, why do certain roles associated with these jobs seem to persist, and what does this mean for different educational disciplines?

The term “bullshit jobs,” popularized by economist David Graeber, typically refers to roles that primarily involve administrative tasks, excessive meetings, corporate emails, and presentation creation—activities that often add little tangible value to an organization. Professions such as project managers or corporate consultants often fit this description, leading to the question: should these positions be among the first to vanish as AI advances?

Intuitively, if AI can streamline project planning, generate reports, and handle communications efficiently, these administrative-heavy roles may indeed become obsolete. Conversely, jobs rooted in physical labor or personal service, such as housekeeping or manufacturing, might be more resistant initially because they depend on human presence and tactile skills.

Another layer to this discussion involves educational backgrounds. Why are degrees in fields like humanities, languages, art and design, or computer science perceived as more at risk than degrees in economics, finance, or administrative disciplines? The assumption might stem from the idea that technical or business-related fields are more directly replaceable by AI algorithms and automation tools, especially in data-driven environments.

However, this perspective warrants deeper reflection. While certain technical skills are increasingly automated, the value of human creativity, critical thinking, empathy, and cultural understanding might provide resilience against disruptive technologies. Similarly, fields such as economics and business administration, which often involve strategic decision-making and nuanced judgment, could also face shifts in job landscape.

In essence, the conversation about AI’s impact on employment isn’t black and white. Some roles, particularly those that are repetitive or administratively focused, may indeed face significant change or disappearance. At the same time, roles that rely on uniquely human qualities—creativity, emotional intelligence, nuanced reasoning—may prove more durable.

Understanding the evolving job market requires us to consider not only the nature of these roles but also the ongoing importance of adaptable skills and interdisciplinary knowledge. As AI continues to reshape industries, staying informed and versatile will be key to navigating the future of work.