If AI Replaces Human Workers First, Will “Bullshit Jobs” in Companies Vanish?

Will AI Replace “Bullshit Jobs” First? Rethinking the Future of Work

As artificial intelligence continues to advance and reshape industries, a common question arises: if AI technology is poised to replace many jobs, why do certain roles—often labeled as “corporate bullshit jobs,” like project managers, consultants, or administrative personnel—seem to be more resilient than others?

Many of these roles involve tasks such as creating PowerPoint presentations, managing emails, or participating in lengthy meetings—activities that critics argue add minimal tangible value. Logically, one might expect these positions to be among the first casualties of automation. After all, if AI can handle data organization, scheduling, and routine reporting, shouldn’t these roles become obsolete more quickly than jobs in sectors like manual labor or service industries?

Furthermore, there’s an intriguing disparity in how educational backgrounds influence job security amid technological shifts. Why are degrees in fields such as humanities, languages, design, or computer science perceived as more vulnerable compared to traditional degrees in economics, finance, or administrative disciplines? Is it related to the nature of the tasks involved, or are there deeper societal and structural factors at play?

Understanding these dynamics is crucial as we navigate the evolving landscape of employment. The conversation challenges us to reevaluate assumptions about value, productivity, and the future roles humans will play in an increasingly automated world. As automation progresses, rethinking the purpose and worth of various professions may be more important than ever.