If Artificial Intelligence Replaces Jobs, Shouldn’t the So-Called Corporate “Bullshit Jobs” Disappear First?

Will AI Eliminate ‘Bullshit Jobs’ Before Traditional Roles Disappear?

As artificial intelligence continues to advance rapidly, many are pondering its impact on the workforce. A common question arises: if AI is poised to replace jobs, should we expect the so-called ‘corporate bullshit jobs’—those primarily involving meetings, emails, and PowerPoint presentations—to vanish first?

These roles, often associated with project management, consulting, and administrative tasks, are frequently criticized for their lack of tangible productivity. Given that they mainly consist of routine activities with limited direct value, one might assume they are the most vulnerable to automation. In theory, as AI becomes more capable, these roles could be phased out, sparing more physically demanding or skilled professions like housekeepers or factory workers.

However, an intriguing observation is the curious pattern of which degrees and fields of study seem most at risk in this evolving landscape. Interestingly, disciplines such as humanities, languages, design, or even certain areas of computer science often face greater uncertainty. Conversely, degrees in economics, finance, or administrative management sometimes appear more insulated.

This paradox prompts reflection on the nature of skills valued in an AI-driven future. It raises questions about whether the roles considered ‘pointless’ today will naturally disappear, or whether societal and economic factors will influence which professions are phased out first. Understanding these nuances is essential for students, professionals, and policymakers aiming to navigate the future of work effectively.

In essence, the ongoing AI transformation challenges our perceptions of productivity and the job market. It encourages us to rethink what kinds of work are truly essential and which roles might become obsolete as technology continues to evolve.