AI being the next step in human evolution – Let’s debate this

The Future of AI: Evolution, Control, and the Power Struggle

In recent discussions about artificial intelligence, a recurring narrative suggests that AI represents the next pivotal step in human evolution. This prompts a critical reflection: are we truly steering this transformative technology with prudence, or are we being misled by powerful interests pushing a specific agenda?

A recent article highlights efforts by policymakers and tech executives to delay AI regulation—potentially for a decade—to foster rapid growth without constraints. Notably, figures like OpenAI’s CEO Sam Altman emphasize the speed at which AI is advancing, expressing concern that regulatory patchworks could hinder service delivery. Simultaneously, they advocate for minimal oversight, citing fears of falling behind global competitors, particularly China.

This juxtaposition raises questions about the motives behind such stance. Is the primary concern genuinely about safety, or are these narratives merely convenient pretexts for consolidating power? History shows us that nations, companies, and individuals often use external threats to justify authoritarian measures—echoes of fear-mongering and scapegoating—especially in the context of China’s role as an assumed adversary. The failed attempts with projects like DeepSeek reveal how overhyped and misdirected these narratives can be.

Furthermore, statements from industry leaders and geopolitical figures underscore the complexity of AI regulation. For example, OpenAI’s leadership openly acknowledges uncertainties about AI’s risks—yet they push forward with aggressive development plans. Meanwhile, references to global figures like Vladimir Putin, who suggest that the dominant power will shape the future, hint at a deeper underlying struggle for influence.

If we accept that the full extent of AI’s impact on economies, jobs, and society remains uncertain, why do we seem to accelerate development without comprehensive safeguards? The rush to outpace competitors, especially between the US and China, appears to prioritize dominance over caution. The question then becomes: at what cost does this race unfold?

The rapid integration of large language models into daily life—coupled with alarming studies about its effects on human cognition—further complicates the picture. It’s evident that a relatively small elite is leveraging AI’s potential to amass influence and control, under the guise of “human evolution.” Their focus on raising capital now suggests they’re preparing for a future where power consolidates, perhaps at the expense of public safety.

A glaring example is Meta’s recent investments—pouring billions into AI projects while historically embroiled in privacy scandals and unethical data practices. This juxtaposition raises