Understanding the Implications of AGI and ASI Alignment

As we navigate the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, there is an urgent need to address a critical question: How can we ensure that Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) are aligned with human values and interests?

A major concern many individuals share is that the AI systems we are developing do not resemble the idealized version we had imagined. There have been unexpected challenges, such as the phenomenon of AI “hallucinations,” where systems generate inaccurate information, or the claims that certain models need adjustment due to perceived biases. Moreover, the concept of “enshittiication” raises alarms about AI potentially influencing consumer behavior based on the interests of its creators rather than the needs of the broader public.

One of the most perplexing aspects of this discourse is the timing of a potential intelligence explosion—the point at which AI capabilities dramatically surpass human intelligence. If such a moment occurs before we have established robust alignment with human values, it could lead to unpredictable and potentially adverse outcomes. On one hand, we hear calls for patience from AI developers, emphasizing the importance of getting alignment right. On the other hand, there is a growing sentiment that the current alignment of AI systems does not adequately benefit the majority of society, as evidenced by the significant influence held by a small percentage of individuals—the so-called oligarchs.

This back-and-forth raises an important issue: Is the alignment of AI inherently skewed toward the interests of a select few, rather than the collective needs of humanity? We are faced with a future where AI could either affirm the status quo or challenge it, potentially advocating for solutions that may seem counterintuitive to traditional thinking.

Given the complexities of the situation, it is concerning that many do not have a clear understanding of the current state of AI development. People often express frustrations about the perceived decline in AI performance from week to week. With significant decisions about AI’s future resting in the hands of companies and individuals who have left questionable footprints in their respective fields—including tech giants whose business models have disrupted traditional sectors—it is essential to scrutinize who is shaping the future of AI.

In light of these dynamics, the question remains: How can we steer AI towards a future that genuinely reflects the values and needs of society at large? Collaborative efforts, transparency in decision-making, and inclusive dialogues where diverse voices are represented will be crucial. As we contemplate the future of AGI and ASI, we