Exploring the Trustworthiness of Gemini 2.5 Pro’s Music Audio Analysis

As someone navigating the complexities of auditory sensitivities, I recently started using Gemini 2.5 Pro to identify certain sounds in music that I find uncomfortable, particularly crowd noise. This innovative software has been a game changer for me after years of avoiding music altogether due to my sensitivities. In the past, I would rely on friends or family to vet songs before I dared to listen to them myself.

So far, I have analyzed three tracks by Weezer. I was informed that one of these songs contained triggering content, while the other two were deemed safe for my listening. However, I find myself somewhat hesitant to dive into those latter tracks, as I worry that Gemini might have misinterpreted the audio analysis. Initially, my research was based solely on articles and reviews, which didn’t provide the definitive insight I needed. It was only after I shared the YouTube links to the songs that I saw the software’s analysis capabilities in action.

This led me to wonder: how accurate is Gemini 2.5 Pro’s audio analysis? Is it susceptible to false negatives, and can it genuinely deliver on its promises?

While I appreciate the technology and its potential for assisting those with auditory sensitivities, these questions linger in my mind. As I continue to explore Gemini’s features, I look forward to gaining a deeper understanding of its limitations and capabilities, hoping it can truly enrich my music experience without overwhelming me.

If you have experience with Gemini 2.5 Pro or similar audio analysis tools, I would love to hear your thoughts!