Assessing the Accuracy of Gemini 2.5 Pro in Music Audio-Analysis Performance

Evaluating the Reliability of Gemini 2.5 Pro’s Music Analysis

As someone who grapples with severe auditory sensitivities, I recently embarked on a journey to enjoy music once again, and Gemini 2.5 Pro has become an invaluable tool in this quest. My primary motivation for using this audio analysis software is to identify certain sounds—particularly crowd noise—that trigger discomfort for me. For years, I struggled to find pleasure in music, often relying on friends or family to filter songs before I would consider listening to them.

Recently, I experimented with scanning a few albums by Weezer. Out of the three tracks I analyzed, I received mixed feedback: one track was flagged as potentially triggering, while the other two were deemed safe for listening. This discrepancy has left me a bit apprehensive about diving into those seemingly acceptable tracks. Could Gemini have misjudged their content?

Initially, I conducted some research based solely on articles and reviews about the software, but I later decided to take it a step further by providing Gemini with direct YouTube links to the songs I was considering. After doing so, it confirmed that it had analyzed the audio directly. This leads me to question the accuracy of its assessments.

How dependable is Gemini 2.5 Pro in detecting specific sound elements? Is it possible for the software to deliver false negatives, where it inaccurately labels a track as safe? And ultimately, can Gemini deliver on its promises of providing reliable audio assessments?

As I continue to explore this tool, I remain hopeful that it can help me reclaim my enjoyment of music while keeping my sensitivities in check. If you’re considering Gemini 2.5 Pro for similar reasons, it might be beneficial to keep these questions in mind.