Evaluating the Trustworthiness of Gemini 2.5 Pro’s Audio Analysis for Music Sensitivity

As someone who has struggled with severe auditory sensitivities, I recently turned to Gemini 2.5 Pro to help me navigate my music choices more effectively. For nearly a decade, I found it challenging to enjoy music due to specific sounds, particularly related to crowd noise, that triggered discomfort. This software has presented itself as a potential game-changer, allowing me to scan albums for the sounds I’m averse to before diving into them.

Thus far, I have analyzed three tracks from Weezer. Interestingly, the analysis indicated that one song was problematic, while the other two were deemed acceptable. My apprehension lies in the possibility that the analysis could be inaccurate, potentially leading me to misjudge the suitability of these tracks. Given that I initially relied on articles and reviews for information, I was intrigued to see how well Gemini would perform once I provided it with direct YouTube links to the songs.

Upon sending the links, Gemini 2.5 Pro claimed to have conducted an audio analysis. However, this brings up a crucial question: how reliable is this software when it comes to evaluating music for sounds that might trigger sensitivities? Is Gemini 2.5 Pro susceptible to false positives or false negatives? Can it truly deliver on its promises?

In exploring these concerns, I invite fellow users and experts to share their experiences with Gemini 2.5 Pro. How has your experience been in terms of accuracy and reliability when scanning for specific audio triggers? Your insights could be invaluable for those of us who are looking for a trustworthy solution to enhance our musical enjoyment while accommodating our auditory sensitivities.