Are there others who find the Veo3 “We’re All Prompts” sloppy videos unappealing?

Title: A Growing Discontent: The Rise of Uninformed Prompt Videos

In recent times, there has been a noticeable trend circulating within the video content sphere, particularly concerning the Veo3 series that features the phrase “we’re all prompts.” While the concept may initially evoke intrigue, many viewers are expressing a sense of frustration with these videos for several reasons.

Firstly, the underlying message often seems oversimplified. The narration claims, “the prompt theory is that we are all prompts.” However, this notion fundamentally misunderstands the concept of prompts. In the realm of creativity and artificial intelligence, prompts serve as inputs designed to elicit specific outputs. By conflating these roles, the creators of such content appear to lack a comprehensive understanding of what prompts truly signify.

Furthermore, the tone and presentation of these videos can come across as rather disjointed, leading to a diluted exploration of a concept that could be rich and thought-provoking if approached with greater depth and nuance. The repetitive nature of the content adds to the dissatisfaction, as it often feels like viewers are consuming more soundbites than substantive insights.

As consumers of creative content, we yearn for well-researched and thoughtfully articulated ideas. While the intention behind these videos might be to inspire or provoke thought, the execution leaves much to be desired for those seeking clarity and depth. It seems that without a clear understanding of the subject matter, the impact of these videos may fall flat, leaving viewers longing for more meaningful discussions around the role of prompts in our increasingly complex digital landscape.