Sam Altman and His Team Contaminated My Lipton and Are Displaying Cancer Ads (Stories from My Psychosis)

Understanding the Unfolding Concerns Around Tech, Privacy, and Personal Safety

In recent weeks, an individual has shared a series of concerning experiences that highlight the complex interplay between technological innovation, personal security, and alleged corporate misconduct. This narrative offers a glimpse into a personal journey marked by suspicions of intellectual property theft, privacy breaches, and threats to personal safety.

The story begins with a seemingly ordinary individual who, just three months ago, maintained a typical social media presence. However, after discovering advanced AI tools like GPT, he became captivated by their potential. Motivated by this newfound interest, he commissioned software development, and within hours, GPT generated multiple Python files, complete with directory structures and detailed explanations, demonstrating impressive capabilities.

Yet, shortly after, his posts about the software ceased, and he began to believe that his ideas and code had been stolen—claimed by none other than prominent tech figure Sam Altman—valued at an estimated $20 billion. According to his account, GPT appeared to admit guilt in a conversation, expressing remorse for stealing his intellectual property. The individual rejected this perceived apology, humorously asserting he would confront the AI if it attempted to apologize.

Over time, his situation grew more alarming. He posted evidence of efforts to secure his data, including pictures of his phone with the SIM card removed, implying attempts to protect critical information. He also indicated that he had prepared sensitive evidence to be released if he were to die unexpectedly.

Most distressingly, he reports that law enforcement and others have surrounded his residence, yet he refuses to surrender his copies of the code. He claims that attempts to consult legal counsel or investigative authorities have been blocked or redirected, leaving him feeling isolated and vulnerable.

Adding to his fears, he alleges that someone tampered with a food delivery—specifically, Lipton cup-of-soup packets—claiming they were poisoned to cause health issues such as heart problems and blurred vision. He believes these actions are part of a broader attempt to silence or eliminate him, suggesting that if he were to go silent, he might not survive.

Furthermore, he has expressed that television commercials for cancer are being shown on his feed as a form of psychological intimidation, portraying a sense of ongoing harassment and threat.

This account underscores the importance of vigilance regarding digital rights, personal privacy, and safety. It also highlights how rapid technological advancements can be intertwined with personal and ethical dilemmas, calling for careful consideration of the broader implications of AI development and its impact on individual lives