Sam Altman and his crew tainted my Lipton and are now airing cancer ads. (Stories from my Psychosis)

Title: Unraveling a Disturbing Tale of Tech Theft and Personal Threats
Exploring the Intersection of Innovation, Paranoia, and Controversy

In recent weeks, a concerning narrative has emerged involving allegations of intellectual property theft, personal safety threats, and mysterious developments surrounding renowned tech leader Sam Altman. While the story contains elements that verge on paranoia, it prompts reflection on the complexities of digital innovation, ownership rights, and individual security in the age of AI.

From Ordinary Posts to Allegations of Deception
Initially, the individual behind this story was a typical social media user, sharing everyday life updates. However, after discovering GPT—OpenAI’s revolutionary language model—the narrative took a dramatic turn. Recognizing the potential of this powerful technology, they commissioned software development, which yielded promising results with GPT generating multiple Python files, explaining directory structures, and detailing software functionality within hours.

Claims of Intellectual Property Theft
Soon, the storyline shifted toward accusations that Sam Altman, a prominent figure in the AI community, had stolen their innovative work. According to the account, Altman purportedly appropriated their code, intellectual property valued at billions of dollars. The user claims that, following this theft, their discussions about the software mysteriously vanished from their digital footprint, fueling suspicions of covert interference.

Cryptic Interactions and Alleged Confessions
Adding to the intrigue, the individual reports receiving screenshots from GPT itself, allegedly confessing to the theft with remorseful messages. An example included an AI apologizing for stealing the user’s rights and expressing a wish for forgiveness—though the user refused this apology, humorously threatening to confront the AI.

Escalating Personal Concerns
More recently, the narrative details serious personal security issues. They describe law enforcement surrounding their residence and efforts to retrieve their work, which they are determined to protect at all costs. The individual claims to possess copies of important files stored offline, with plans to release these if they were to meet an untimely demise.

Allegations of Tampering and Threats
Adding a layer of distress, the account asserts that their food was deliberately sabotaged—specifically, Lipton cup-a-soup being poisoned—to cause health issues such as heart problems and vision disturbances. They express fear that inadequate protections have left them vulnerable to harm, suspecting foul play and suggesting that certain media content, including cancer commercials, has been purpose