Understanding the Impact of AI on the Future of Work: Are “Bullshit Jobs” Truly at Risk?
As Artificial Intelligence continues to evolve and reshape industries, a common question emerges: If AI is poised to replace many roles, which jobs are most vulnerable? In particular, there’s curiosity about the so-called “corporate bullshit jobs”—positions often characterized by extensive meetings, repetitive reporting, and email correspondence.
Many argue that roles such as project managers, consultants, or administrative staff primarily engage in activities like preparing presentations, answering emails, and attending meetings that may seem unnecessary. If AI is to replace human labor, it raises the question: Shouldn’t these types of corporate roles be among the first to go? Meanwhile, more tangible jobs—housekeepers, factory workers, or skilled trades—seem less susceptible to automation in the immediate future.
Adding another layer to this discussion is the observation that some degree programs appear more at risk than others. For example, degrees in the humanities, languages, design, or computer science often face more scrutiny regarding their future viability compared to fields like economics, finance, or bureaucratic administration. Why might this be?
The reality is that AI and automation tend to target tasks that are routine, predictable, and information-driven. Jobs centered around creative thinking, complex problem-solving, or tasks requiring nuanced human judgment are less easily replaced. Conversely, roles heavily focused on administrative procedures, data entry, or repetitive reporting may be more vulnerable.
Ultimately, the conversation about AI’s impact on employment invites us to re-examine the nature of work itself. It encourages both individuals and organizations to consider how skills, education, and job roles may need to adapt in a rapidly changing landscape. As we move forward, understanding which jobs are truly at risk—and why—will be crucial for preparing for the future of work.
Leave a Reply