If AI will replace jobs, aren’t ,the so called corporate“bullshit jobs” supposed to disappear first?

Will AI lead to the disappearance of “Meaningless” Corporate Jobs Before Frontline Positions?

As Artificial Intelligence continues to advance, questions about the future of employment are becoming more prevalent. Many wonder: if AI is set to automate or replace a broad range of roles, why do some “corporate” jobs—often labeled as “bullshit jobs”—seem to be on the chopping block first?

These so-called administrative or managerial roles—such as project managers, business consultants, or frequent email responders—are frequently criticized for revolving around meetings, PowerPoint presentations, and email correspondence that some deem unnecessary or overly bureaucratic. This raises an intriguing point: should these roles vanish ahead of others like housekeepers or factory workers, who perform essential, tangible tasks?

Another layer to this discussion involves education pathways. Why do certain degrees—such as those in humanities, languages, design, or computer science—appear more vulnerable to automation or obsolescence compared to fields like economics, finance, or administrative management? What underlying factors influence the perceived risk levels of various professional domains?

The evolving landscape of work prompts us to reflect on the nature of these roles and the societal value we assign to different types of labor. As AI continues to reshape industries, it’s worth pondering which jobs truly serve society and which are perceived as unnecessary or redundant. This conversation urges both policymakers and individuals to consider how to adapt and redefine work in the era of automation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *