Will AI Eliminate “Bullshit Jobs” Before Traditional Roles?
As Artificial Intelligence continues to evolve and reshape industries, many wonder which roles will be impacted most. A common question arises: If AI has the potential to replace many jobs, shouldn’t those considered “corporate bullshit jobs” — like project management, consulting, or administrative roles that primarily involve creating PowerPoints, responding to endless emails, and attending unnecessary meetings — be the first to go?
It seems logical that these administrative or managerial functions, often characterized as needlessly elaborate or unproductive, would be among the first casualties of automation. After all, their core activities are repetitive, data-driven, and well-suited to AI solutions. Conversely, roles such as housekeepers or factory workers, which involve tangible manual tasks and physical labor, might appear less vulnerable initially.
This disparity raises an intriguing question about educational backgrounds and professional vulnerability. Why are certain academic disciplines—such as humanities, languages, design, or even computer science—perceived to be at higher risk of automation or obsolescence compared to fields like economics, finance, or administrative management?
Understanding these dynamics invites a broader discussion about the future of work, the real nature of “bullshit jobs,” and how technological advancements might reshape employment opportunities across various sectors. As we navigate this evolving landscape, considering which roles are truly indispensable will be crucial for individuals and organizations alike.
Leave a Reply