Will AI Replace Jobs? Shouldn’t the so-called “corporate bullshit jobs” vanish first? (Variation 140)

Will AI Replace ‘Bullshit Jobs’ First? A Closer Look at the Future of Work

As artificial intelligence continues to advance and reshape industries, a common question arises: if AI is destined to replace many jobs, which roles are most at risk? Interestingly, this leads to a provocative thought—are the so-called “corporate ‘bullshit jobs’” the ones most likely to disappear first?

Many critics point out that certain roles—such as project managers, consultants, and administrative assistants—often involve tasks like creating PowerPoint presentations, responding to endless emails, and attending seemingly unnecessary meetings. These positions, frequently labeled as “bullshit jobs,” are viewed by some as redundant or unproductive in the modern workplace. If automation and AI can perform routine tasks more efficiently, it seems logical to assume that such roles would fade away before more tangible jobs like housekeepers or factory workers.

This perspective invites a deeper question: why do certain educational backgrounds appear more vulnerable to automation than others? For instance, degrees in humanities, languages, design, or computer science often face more scrutiny regarding their relevance in the AI-driven future, while fields like economics, finance, or administrative administration tend to be considered more resilient.

The reason behind this discrepancy is complex and multifaceted. Roles heavily based on routine, repetitive tasks—regardless of the degree—are inherently more susceptible to automation. However, jobs that require nuanced understanding, creativity, emotional intelligence, or critical thinking—skills often associated with humanities and arts—may be more resistant to AI integration. Conversely, degrees in fields like finance or business administration often lead to roles involving data analysis, strategic planning, or regulatory tasks that can—at least in part—be automated or optimized with technology.

In essence, the future of employment is likely to be shaped by the nature of the work itself. While AI may render some jobs obsolete—particularly those rooted in routine or administrative functions—roles that demand adaptation, innovative thinking, and human-centric skills will continue to be vital. The key for individuals and educational institutions alike is to recognize these shifts early and adapt accordingly, fostering skills that complement and leverage AI rather than compete with it.