Will AI Replace Jobs? Shouldn’t the “Corporate ‘Bullshit Jobs’” Be the First to Vanish? (Variation 157)

Are “Bullshit Jobs” the First to Go in an AI-Driven Future?

As artificial intelligence continues to advance, many are questioning which jobs might be eliminated first. A common assumption is that roles often labeled as “corporate bullshit jobs”—such as project managers, consultants, or administrative positions—are most vulnerable because they primarily involve tasks like preparing presentations, managing emails, and attending meetings that some see as unnecessary.

This raises an interesting paradox: if AI and automation are poised to replace certain kinds of work, shouldn’t these administrative and managerial roles, often criticized for their lack of tangible output, be among the first to vanish? After all, if the core value of a job lies in redundant paperwork or meetings, it seems an AI could easily take over.

Meanwhile, why do some educational disciplines, such as humanities, languages, design, or computer science, appear more susceptible to disruption than fields like economics, finance, or bureaucratic administration? Is it because their skills are perceived as less directly tied to routine tasks, or is there another reason?

This line of inquiry invites us to reflect on the evolving landscape of employment and the true nature of work in a future increasingly shaped by intelligent automation. It challenges us to consider which jobs genuinely contribute value and how we can rethink careers in a world where AI might handle many of today’s routine responsibilities.