Will AI Eliminate Jobs? Shouldn’t the So-Called Corporate ‘Bullshit Jobs’ Vanish First?

Will AI Eliminate “Bullshit Jobs” Before Replacing Traditional Workers? A Closer Look

As artificial intelligence continues to advance, many are pondering its impact on the workforce. A common question arises: if AI is set to replace jobs, shouldn’t the so-called “corporate bullshit jobs” — those perceived as unnecessary or trivial — be among the first to go?

Many roles in management, consulting, and administrative support often involve activities like creating presentations, replying to endless emails, and attending meetings that may seem unproductive. These tasks are frequently labeled as “bureaucratic” or “pointless,” raising the question: are these roles destined to vanish as AI automates repetitive tasks? If so, does this mean that roles traditionally viewed as essential, such as housekeepers or factory workers, will persist longer?

Another layer to this discussion involves the educational backgrounds that are more vulnerable to automation. Fields like humanities, languages, design, or even computer science sometimes face skepticism about their future relevance. However, why are degrees in economics, finance, or administrative disciplines perceived as more secure? Are these traditional fields inherently more resilient to technological change, or is it a matter of societal and economic valuation?

The conversation about AI’s role in reshaping employment is complex and multifaceted. While automation may render some roles obsolete, it also prompts a reevaluation of what skills and jobs are truly vital in the evolving economy. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for learners, professionals, and policymakers alike as we navigate the future of work.