Will AI Displace Jobs First? What About the so-Called Corporate “Bullshit Jobs”?

Will AI Eliminate “Bullshit Jobs” Before Replacing More Skilled Roles?

As artificial intelligence continues to advance, a pressing question has emerged: if AI is poised to automate a wide range of work, should we expect certain types of jobs—particularly those often labeled as “corporate bullshit jobs”—to vanish first?

Many critics argue that roles such as project managers, consultants, or corporate administrative positions primarily involve activities like crafting presentations, handling emails, and participating in numerous meetings that may lack genuine productivity. If these jobs are considered redundant or unnecessary, logically, they should be among the first to be replaced by automation.

This raises a paradox: why do we see these administrative or managerial roles continuing to persist, while more physically grounded jobs like housekeepers or factory workers remain comparatively stable? Is it due to economic, social, or structural factors that influence the pace at which different jobs are automated?

Interestingly, not all degrees face the same level of risk in an AI-driven future. Fields such as humanities, languages, design, or computer science seem more vulnerable than areas like economics, finance, or administrative management. What explains this disparity? Is it linked to the nature of the tasks involved, the versatility of skills obtained, or societal perceptions of certain professions?

Understanding which jobs are most susceptible to automation—and why—can help us better prepare for the evolving labor landscape. Recognizing the distinct characteristics of various roles and disciplines is essential as we navigate the transition toward an AI-enhanced work environment.