Of 2024 U.S. presidential candidates— who was most to least likely to achieve this? Who’s Missing here??

Understanding the 2024 U.S. Presidential Contenders: Who Holds the Potential for Systemic Change?

As the 2024 presidential race heats up, a crucial question emerges: which candidates are most likely to champion a transformative agenda reminiscent of Scandinavian-style progress in areas such as clean energy, transportation, healthcare, and economic independence? Here, we present an analytical ranking of the leading contenders based on their policy stances, governance approach, and willingness to challenge entrenched interests — from most promising to those less likely to push meaningful reform. Additionally, we examine who might be unexpectedly missing from this transformative lineup.

Top Potential Catalysts for Systemic Change in 2024

1. Dean Phillips (Democratic Candidate)

Why he stands out:
Phillips has publicly criticized the Democratic establishment for stagnation and resistance to modernization. He champions increased transparency in healthcare pricing, bipartisan efforts for economic reform, and supports investment in nuclear and clean energy technologies. His approach signals a readiness to challenge legacy donors and push technocratic solutions that could overhaul current systems.

What holds him back:
Limited political influence and media presence may hinder his ability to effect rapid change, despite a credible and forward-looking platform.

2. Vivek Ramaswamy (Republican Candidate)

Why he ranks highly:
Ramaswamy advocates for aggressive deregulation, reshore critical supply chains, and challenge monopolistic sectors like Big Pharma. His emphasis on “energy dominance” could, if refocused toward renewables, accelerate sustainable energy efforts.

Weaknesses:
His stance on fossil fuels and skepticism of climate policy conflict with long-term clean energy ambitions. His positioning might face criticism from both sides in the context of environmental urgency.

3. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Independent Candidate)

Why he’s notable:
Kennedy’s anti-corporate, anti-pharma, and anti-war rhetoric positions him as a decentralization advocate. His push for significant health reform and regulatory overhaul reflects a desire to dismantle captured institutions.

Limitations:
Some extreme health views may undermine his credibility and reduce broad public support for systemic reforms.

4. Ron DeSantis (Republican Governor)

Why he’s a contender:
DeSantis has demonstrated effective state-level administration on infrastructure and policy implementation. His potential to pursue economic sovereignty reforms at the federal level exists if he chooses to prioritize them.

Weaknesses: