A Critical Look at Viral “Prompt” Videos: Understanding the Miscommunication

In recent times, the internet has seen an influx of videos, particularly those produced by Veo3, that tout the phrase “we’re all prompts.” While the idea may sound intriguing at first glance, many viewers, myself included, find themselves frustrated by the oversimplification of such a complex topic.

These videos often claim that the “prompt theory” equates human existence to prompts—inputs that generate outputs. However, this premise highlights a fundamental misunderstanding of how prompts function in various contexts. Prompts are designed to elicit responses or behaviors; they serve as catalysts in a creative process, rather than embodying the output themselves. The result is a series of videos that not only misinterpret their core subject matter but also fail to engage viewers on a meaningful level.

As creators and consumers of content, it’s important to critically evaluate the messages being presented. Understanding the distinction between input and output can lead to a deeper appreciation of the complexity of our interactions—both with technology and one another. It’s time to shift focus from sensationalized concepts to more nuanced discussions that truly reflect the intricacies of our experiences.

Have you come across these videos? What are your thoughts? Let’s dive into this topic and explore the implications of such oversimplified narratives in today’s digital landscape.