Evaluating the Reliability of Gemini 2.5 Pro’s Audio Analysis for Music

In the ever-evolving world of audio analysis, Gemini 2.5 Pro has caught the attention of many individuals grappling with auditory sensitivities. As someone who has avoided music for nearly a decade due to discomfort from specific sounds—particularly crowd noise—this tool has been a game changer for me. I’ve suddenly found a way to explore albums that interest me without the fear of triggering my sensitivities, something I previously relied on friends and family to assist me with during my teenage years.

Recently, I used Gemini 2.5 Pro to evaluate three songs from the band Weezer. The analysis provided me with mixed results; while one track was flagged as potentially problematic, the other two were deemed acceptable to listen to. However, I find myself hesitant to dive into these latter two songs, anxious about the possibility of misinterpretation by the software. Initially, my research into the application was limited to reviewing articles and testimonials rather than assessing the analytics based on the audio itself. It wasn’t until I provided individual YouTube links for each song that the software performed its analysis.

With this in mind, I have a few lingering questions about the overall accuracy of Gemini 2.5 Pro. Can it truly deliver on its promises? Is it susceptible to false positives or negatives during its analyses? As I continue to explore new music while navigating my auditory sensitivities, I look forward to understanding just how dependable this tool is for my needs. Are there any similar experiences out there, or insights from fellow users that can shed light on the reliability of this software?