Evaluating the Trustworthiness of Gemini 2.5 Pro’s Music Audio Analysis

As someone who has struggled with auditory sensitivities for many years, finding ways to enjoy music has been a challenge. Recently, I’ve been exploring the capabilities of Gemini 2.5 Pro, an audio analysis tool that promises to assist users in identifying specific sounds in music tracks. I mainly sought this software to help me filter out certain crowd noises that I find overwhelming.

So far, I have tested Gemini 2.5 Pro on three songs from the band Weezer. The initial results were promising; I received feedback that one of the tracks was indeed triggering for me, while the other two were deemed perfectly fine. However, I am left wondering about the reliability of these analyses. Could it be possible that the software is prone to errors? My past experiences have made me cautious, as I often relied on friends or family to preview songs before I deemed them listenable.

To ensure the accuracy of the analyses, I provided Gemini with direct YouTube links to the songs, prompting the software to analyze the audio content directly rather than relying solely on articles and reviews. This method seemed more reliable, but it still raises questions about how trustworthy this tool really is in discerning sounds that may be off-putting.

In light of this, I’m eager to hear from others. Has anyone else utilized Gemini 2.5 Pro for similar purposes? How dependable have your experiences been? Are the analyses typically accurate, or is there a significant risk of false negatives? I would love to know if this software can truly deliver on its promises and help individuals like me regain a love for music without the dread of triggering sounds. Your insights would be greatly appreciated!