Evaluating the Trustworthiness of Gemini 2.5 Pro’s Music Audio Analysis

As a user of Gemini 2.5 Pro, I recently embarked on a journey to explore music that aligns with my tastes and avoids specific sounds that I find particularly unsettling—especially crowd noise. For someone who has struggled with auditory sensitivities for nearly a decade, this software seems like a game-changer. In the past, I often relied on friends and family members to pre-screen songs before I could enjoy them, a process that became increasingly burdensome over time.

So far, I have analyzed three tracks from Weezer. Interestingly, one of the songs flagged as potentially triggering indeed contained elements that affected me, while the other two were marked as safe. However, I’m left with a lingering sense of doubt. Could it be possible that the latter tracks were misidentified by the software? Initially, I conducted my research based on articles and reviews rather than direct auditory analysis until I provided individual YouTube links for Gemini to examine.

This brought up an important question: How reliable is Gemini 2.5 Pro’s audio analysis? Can I trust its findings? I am particularly curious about the software’s potential for false negatives—instances where it may inaccurately designate a track as safe, even though it contains elements that could be distressing for certain listeners.

I invite both seasoned users and those discerning about audio clarity to weigh in. Have you found Gemini 2.5 Pro to be trustworthy in its analysis? Does it deliver on its promises? Your insights would be invaluable as I consider whether to fully embrace this tool in my musical explorations.