Evaluating the Trustworthiness of Gemini 2.5 Pro’s Audio Analysis for Music

As a passionate music lover grappling with severe auditory sensitivities, discovering Gemini 2.5 Pro has opened up a world of possibilities for me. For almost ten years, I found it challenging to enjoy music due to overwhelming sounds, particularly those associated with crowd noise. This situation frequently necessitated consulting friends and family for their input on songs before I considered listening to them myself.

Recently, I started using Gemini 2.5 Pro to scan specific albums to identify sounds I find uncomfortable. So far, I’ve analyzed three tracks from Weezer. While I received feedback that one song contained triggering elements, the other two were deemed acceptable. However, I can’t shake the concern that Gemini might be misjudging the latter tracks. Initially, my research into the software relied on articles and reviews rather than a hands-on approach, but I decided to take a step further by providing individual YouTube links for a more thorough analysis.

This leads me to wonder: How reliable is the audio analysis that Gemini 2.5 Pro claims to perform? Are false negatives a common occurrence? Can this software genuinely deliver on its promises?

As I continue my journey with Gemini 2.5 Pro, I remain curious and cautious. It holds significant potential for transforming how I engage with music, but I want to ensure I can trust its assessments as I explore this new avenue. I would appreciate insights from others who have used the software or have experience with audio analysis tools. How has your experience been? Do you feel confident in their accuracy? Your feedback could be invaluable in determining whether Gemini 2.5 Pro is the answer to my music-related challenges.