The Misconception of “We’re All Prompts”: A Critical Look at VEO3 Videos

In recent weeks, I’ve noticed a surge in videos produced by VEO3 that discuss the concept of “we’re all prompts.” While this notion attempts to foster a sense of connection and creativity, many viewers, including myself, find it rather off-putting.

The primary issue lies in the interpretation of prompts themselves. In these videos, the narration often states, “the prompt theory suggests that we are all prompts.” However, prompts serve as inputs for creative processes, not as outputs or reflections of our identities. This fundamental misunderstanding highlights a larger problem: a lack of clarity and precision in the content being shared.

It seems that the creators of these videos may not fully grasp the concept of prompts and their role in communication and creativity. As someone who values insightful and informative content, I find it disappointing to see such pivotal ideas being misrepresented.

Instead of celebrating our creative potential through accurate definitions and thoughtful exploration, we are inundated with superficial interpretations that detract from the richness of the subject. As consumers of content, we seek clarity and depth, and I believe it’s crucial for creators to uphold these standards.

What are your thoughts on this trend? Do you also find it frustrating when concepts are oversimplified or misrepresented? Let’s discuss the importance of understanding foundational ideas in the creative space.