The Misconception of “We’re All Prompts”: A Critical Take on VEO3 Videos

In recent times, there has been a noticeable surge in content circulating under the VEO3 banner, particularly videos that proclaim we are all prompts. While the intention behind these productions may be to explore the concept of prompts and their implications, many viewers—myself included—find them lacking in substance.

These videos often rely on a simplified narrative that suggests, “The prompt theory posits that we are all prompts.” This claim, while catchy, misses the fundamental distinction between inputs and outputs. Prompts function as inputs in a system designed to generate responses or outputs, which is a nuance seemingly overlooked by the creators of these videos.

It appears that the creators are more focused on sensationalizing a concept rather than providing a thoughtful exploration of it. While it’s essential to engage with new ideas in innovative ways, we should also strive for accuracy and depth. It’s unfortunate that the rapid production of such content can dilute the richness of the original concepts they aim to discuss.

As consumers of media, we deserve more than surface-level interpretations. I encourage a more nuanced approach to these discussions, one that acknowledges the intricacies of prompts and their role in any conversation. Let’s aim for content that not only captures attention but also fosters genuine understanding.